ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the transmission of COVID-19 in a U.S. state psychiatric hospital setting. METHODS: Symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were tested throughout a large psychiatric hospital to determine penetrance. The hospital followed initial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent (N=51 of 65) of tested patients in the building where the first positive patient was housed (building zero) tested positive for COVID-19. Eighty-eight percent (N=14 of 16) of tested asymptomatic patients in building zero were positive, compared with 12% (N=6 of 51) of randomly selected asymptomatic patients in a sample from the rest of the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients can become positive for COVID-19 despite following initial CDC guidelines. As such, use of masks by all patients in close-quarter settings prior to the first positive case appears warranted. Recent CDC guidelines align with this strategy.
Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control , Mental Disorders , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/virology , Epidemiologic Studies , Female , Hospitals, State/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Random Allocation , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Data on the outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care in Poland are limited. There are no data on critically ill patients with COVID-19 who did not meet criteria for ICU admission. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed patients admitted to the ICU and those ineligible for ICU admission in a large COVID-19-dedicated hospital, during the first 3 months of the pandemic in Poland. Data from 67 patients considered for ICU admissions due to COVID-19 infection, treated between 10 March and 10 June 2020, were reviewed. Following exclusions, data on 32 patients admitted to the ICU and 21 patients ineligible for ICU admission were analyzed. RESULTS In 38% of analyzed patients, symptoms of COVID-19 infection occurred during a hospital stay for an unrelated medical issue. The mean age of ICU patients was 62.4 (10.4) years, and the majority of patients were male (69%), with at least one comorbidity (88%). The mean admission APACHE II and SAPS II scores were 20.1 (8.1) points and 51.2 (15.3) points, respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index and Clinical Frailty Scale were lower in ICU patients compared with those disqualified: 5.9 (4.3) vs. 9.1 (3.5) points, P=0.01, and 4.7 (1.7) vs. 6.9 (1.2) points, P<0.01, respectively. All ICU patients required intubation and mechanical ventilation. ICU mortality was 67%. Hospital mortality among patients admitted to the ICU and those who were disqualified was 70% and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with COVID-19 requiring ICU admission in our studied population were frail and had significant comorbidities. The outcomes in this group were poor and did not seem to be influenced by ICU admission.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status Indicators , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, State/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Poland/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Survivors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: On 21 February 2020, Schiavonia Hospital (SH) detected the first 2 cases of COVID-19 in Veneto Region. As a result of the underlying concomitant spread of infection, SH had to rearrange the clinical services in terms of structural changes to the building, management of spaces, human resources and supplies, in order to continue providing optimal care to the patients and staff safety. The aim of this article is to describe how SH was able to adjust its services coping with the epidemiological stages of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three periods can be identified; in each one the most important organizational modifications are analyzed (hospital activities, logistical changes, communication, surveillance on HCW). RESULTS: The first period, after initial cases' identification, was characterized by the hospital isolation. In the second period the hospital reopened and it was divided into two completely separated areas, named COVID-19 and COVID-free, to prevent intra-hospital contamination. The last period was characterized by the re-organization of the facility as the largest COVID Hospital in Veneto, catching exclusively COVID-19 patients from the surrounding areas. CONCLUSIONS: SH changed its organization three times in less than two months. From the point of view of the Medical Direction of the Hospital the challenges had been many but it allowed to consolidate an organizational model which could answer to health needs during the emergency situation.